CFRW CAPITOL UPDATE – October 31, 2025

Officially Chartered by the National Federation of Republican Women and the California Republican Party
From the Desk of Lydia Kanno, CFRW President
Submitted by Michaela Swaney
October 31, 2025

End of The California Legislative Session

On Sunday, October 12th, was the last day Gavin Newsom had to sign or veto bills passed out of the legislature. This year 989 bills were passed and signed into law and 123 were vetoed. For the end of session bills, he waited until this last day to sign a lot of them, including AB 495, the bill that would allow relatives of the 5th degree to take guardianship of a child without a parental signature. We did have some wins with the amendments: we were able to get the author to amend and take out a non-relative clause, but a relative on a 5th degree without any ID verification is a very scary reality.
Even though many bad bills went through, we did however have some wins this session;
AB 84, that would have taken away non classroom based charter schools and many enrichment charter school vendors would be shut down. This bill was defeated in the Legislature by many grassroots activists. Your voices made a difference.
SB 771, a social media accountability act that would fine social media companies up to $1 million per occurrence for allowing a California definition of “Hate Speech” has been vetoed. I had spoken about this bill and how I believed it would run into legal trouble with federal law and section 230; looks like Newsom figured that out too and vetoed it last Sunday.

AB 1127- Firearms: Converter Pistols

This law updates the definition of machine guns and bans the sale of semi-automatic pistols that could potentially be converted into fully automatic weapons using so-called ‘Glock switches.’ Keep in mind, those devices are already illegal. This now changes the definition and defines your Glock as a machine gun in California. The NRA has already filed lawsuits against this bill, citing it as unconstitutional.

AB 715- Educational Equity: Discrimination: Antisemitism Prevention

This bill centered around Education Equity and Discrimination in schools, as many of you know the DOJ sent a letter to California in June stating its education code violates Title 9 of the federal code, and if this is not amended, California could lose around 8 billion dollars in federal funding. In response, California chose to ignore this and say they will not comply, risking losing that funding for the schools.
Now with a lot of different districts here standing up against transgender participation in women’s sports, California just passed AB 715 that expands protections for all school programs and activities that would discriminate against sex, including the LGBT community. This bill establishes the new Office Of Civil Rights, which would oversee enforcement on all public and charter schools.
This bill adds that discriminatory bias in instruction and school-sponsored activities does not require a showing of direct harm to members of a protected group and would not require members of a protected group to be present while the discriminatory bias is occurring.
This clause right here is critical, and could lead to this new office punishing schools for not just refusing to teach about all the new genders, but also could prevent schools from implementing bans on transgenders in women’s sports.

Prop 50: Final Week

Now going into Prop 50, I do not think the redistricting hearings in the Legislature are being talked about enough, notably the Assembly Elections Committee, where we only hold 2 Republican seats.
We watched the Democrats blatantly break the law.
They refused to hear or put into the record over 16,000 public comments.
Democrats were given access to the bill language before Republicans.
Members admitted they do not read the bills before voting.
They stated openly that the purpose was to eliminate Republicans.
They refused to disclose who drew the redistricting maps,
Turned off Republicans’ microphones when they were speaking, and forced a vote.
When challenged, they justified breaking procedure by saying that “others did it before” and that “times are different now,” as if that excused ignoring established law.
And this rhetoric about Texas is completely misleading. Texas is redistricting within the law and under multiple ongoing Voting Rights Act lawsuits. Meanwhile, what California is doing is blatant lawbreaking. The state legislature not only violated the California Constitution by drawing and passing maps themselves — a process that’s supposed to be handled by an independent citizens’ commission — but they’ve openly admitted their goal is to eliminate another political party from representation.
In a republic, the Constitution was designed to limit government power, not to serve majority interests. The Bill of Rights and the 14th and 15th Amendments protect individual and minority rights from the tyranny of the majority. Even when a policy is framed as “the people’s will,” as with Proposition 50, it doesn’t make it constitutional. A 51% vote doesn’t make it right — and it certainly doesn’t make it lawful.
Now, the Supreme Court is considering a major redistricting case, Louisiana v. Callais, which could fundamentally change Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The Court is being asked to decide whether drawing maps based on race, even to protect minority voting power, is unconstitutional. This matters because it will determine whether race can be used to draw maps. This was the reason for a lot of the lawsuits from the originally drawn Texas 2021 maps. The Court hasn’t announced a decision timeline, but analysts expect the case could be decided by next June.
The Framers of the Constitution never intended for political lines to be drawn by race — their goal was to ensure every citizen’s voice counts equally, regardless of color or creed. Assuming that people of a certain race will vote one way is itself a form of racism and runs counter to both the Equal Protection Clause and the principle of individual liberty.
So while Texas operates under the scrutiny of current federal law, California is disregarding both state and constitutional safeguards to consolidate political power. This is the very majority tyranny the Constitution was written to prevent.
A recent visit to the Placer County Clerk-Recorder’s office provided an in-depth look at how the upcoming election is being managed under a very compressed timeline. The county team is responsible for completing 500 required election tasks, and more than 100 had to be completed within just a few days. According to Clerk-Recorder Ryan Ronco, who has worked in elections since 1992, the pace and pressure of this cycle are unprecedented.
Due to the shortened preparation period, only a limited number of in-person voting locations could be secured. Voters are strongly encouraged to cast their ballots in person to support staff in managing and processing ballots efficiently. Mail-in ballots face an increased risk of delayed delivery, particularly in rural counties that often lack the staffing and resources to conduct elections under such tight deadlines. After Election Day, counties will have just 15 days to certify results before beginning voter registration processes for district elections in December ahead of the midterms.
Additionally, recent speculation about Placer County shifting politically toward the center and turning “Purple” has been refuted by data. In 2022, registered Republicans held an 8% lead over Democrats; as of 2025, that lead has expanded to 10%. This trend reflects a broader movement across multiple counties in California, signaling growing momentum for conservative representation statewide.
As of this October 27th, the total ballots mailed out by party were:
  • 10,341,865 Democrats
  • 5,818,252 Republicans
  • 6,862,704 No Party Preference
Of those ballots, this is the current amount that has been returned:
  • 2,272,883 Democrats
  • 1,229,589 Republicans
  • 933,517 No Party Preference
Now we know that the majority of in-person election day votes tends to be Republicans, and a lot of those with No Party Preference will be voting No. Special elections tend to only have about a 30% turnout, but we are hoping to make this at least a 50% turnout or more. We need to turn out bigger than any special election in history.

Government Shutdown: October 27th Update

October 27th is day 27 of the government shutdown and the Senate has now voted 12 times in an effort to reopen the government, with the Democrats blaming the Republicans and even stating it’s their fault since they have control over the House and Senate. The reality of this is although the continuing resolution was passed in the House, it has a filibuster in the Senate; we need 60 votes and we only have 53 Republicans. So if we do not get Democrats to vote yes, the government cannot reopen. They are using this as a power grab in hopes that Republicans give in and overturn healthcare provisions that were passed in the Big Beautiful Bill.
During this shutdown, President Trump has used his Executive Authority and used tariff funds to keep vulnerable programs like WIC open, along with pulling money from The Department Of War to pay our military this last paycheck. The democrats even criticized Trump for using his Executive authority to do these things.
On Thursday, October 23rd the Senate voted on S.3012 – the Shutdown Fairness Act, a bill introduced by Republicans that would have provided funding for essential federal workers and active duty military during the shutdown. The measure failed to reach the sixty votes required to advance, falling short by six Democrat votes.
Earlier last week, on October 21st, the Senate heard S.3024 – the Keep SNAP Funded Act, another Republican introduced bill designed to continue SNAP benefits throughout the shutdown. The bill was read and referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee, which currently has no hearing scheduled for it. However, since this is considered an urgency bill, there is hope that the committee will schedule a hearing as soon as possible.
During Monday’s Senate session, Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) stated that members of Congress should not be collecting pay while federal workers remain unpaid, and she urged her colleagues to forgo long weekends and remain in Washington until the shutdown is resolved. Many Republicans have already done this and are not being paid.
Meanwhile, H.R. 5371 – the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, which would have reopened the government, failed to advance for debate in the Senate Monday, with many seats in the chamber remaining empty during the vote.

Immigration Enforcement & SB 627

Just as federal authority is critical in these situations, it is also essential when states try to overstep their bounds. The Constitution gives the federal government exclusive authority over immigration, entry, and removal of non‑citizens. States cannot set their own parallel immigration enforcement regimes that conflict with federal law, including one of California’s recently passed bills, SB 627, which bans masks on ICE agents. Our acting U.S. Attorney General, Bill Essayli, stated this law violates federal law and will not be enforced. California cannot control federal ICE agents. Although there have been cases of lower federal judges ruling against certain ICE policies and even National Guard deployments, Supreme Court rulings have increasingly struck down these district court decisions, pushing toward more permissive ICE practices. This establishes that, under federal law and constitutional authority, these ICE raids are fully legal and constitutional.

Copyright © 2025 California Federation of Republican Women, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you are a member of the California Federation of Republican Women.

Our mailing address is:

California Federation of Republican Women

428 J St Ste 400

Sacramento, CA 95814-2394